PERFORMANCE OF A COHERENT JET COOLANT SYSTEM IN NON-CONTINUOUS DRESS CREEP-FEED GRINDING OF INCONEL 718
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, the effect of the degree of jet coherency on the occurrence of workpiece burn when creep-feed grinding Inconel 718 under non-continuous dress conditions is studied. Different degrees of jet coherency are compared on the basis of the maximum material removal rate achievable before workpiece burn occurs. The comparison is performed at different coolant flow rates as well as at different distances between nozzle and grinding zone. It is found that a more coherent jet results in considerably higher possible material removal rates before workpiece burn occurs. Furthermore, it is determined that nozzle distance from the grinding zone and nozzle orientation and position with respect to the grinding zone, using a coherent jet, does not affect cooling performance. It is also shown that an increase in flow rate will increase cooling performance but only up to a point.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it