Chronic kidney disease among Aboriginal people living in Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a significant health burden on Aboriginal communities around the world. High rates of diabetes among Aboriginal Canadians are an important contributing factor to the rising rates of CKD in this population, and diabetes has been the leading cause of kidney failure among Aboriginal patients initiating dialysis in Canada for the last decade. This paper will describe access to, quality of, and outcomes associated with the renal care of Aboriginal people living in Canada. RESULTS: Research shows that rates of CKD are higher among Aboriginal people residing in Canada, and that despite remote residence location, use of peritoneal dialysis is substantially lower than in white patients. Similarly, although mortality rates among Canadian hemodialysis patients are similar for Aboriginals and for whites, Aboriginal patients have substantially reduced access to kidney transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: A concerted effort to lower rates of CKD in this population is needed. Changes in healthcare policy that successfully translate into healthcare provider and patient level improvements in access to and the quality of care will be needed to significantly reduce the risk of CKD and progression to kidney failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it