X-ray Photoelectron and Absorption Spectroscopy of Metal-Rich Phosphides <i>M</i><sub>2</sub>P and <i>M</i><sub>3</sub>P (<i>M</i> = Cr−Ni)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electronic structures of metal-rich binary phosphides M 2 P and M 3 P ( M = Cr−Ni) have been examined by means of X-ray photoelectron and absorption spectroscopy and compared with those of the monophosphides M P. The P 2p 3/2 binding and P K-edge absorption energies decrease with greater ionic character of the M −P bonding and indicate the presence of anionic phosphorus, contrary to previous theoretical assertions but consistent with our previous results. Interatomic effects play a more important role in affecting the energy shifts in these metal-rich phosphides than in the monophosphides, becoming more pronounced with higher metal concentration. Although the M 2p 3/2 XPS spectra show no discernible shifts in binding energies, they reveal satellite features whose intensity can be related to metal charge in the Co- and Ni-containing phosphides. In these cases, the metal charge becomes less positive with higher metal concentration. For Ni 2 P and Ni 3 P, this trend was confirmed from an analysis of the Ni L-edge and M-edge XANES spectra.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".