MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

V-Shaped Multislit Weirs

2013· article· en· W1994002289 on OpenAlexaff
A. S. Ramamurthy, J. Kai, Sang Soo Han

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeirReynolds numberDischarge coefficientFlow (mathematics)MechanicsRange (aeronautics)Flow measurementVolumetric flow rateHydrology (agriculture)TurbulenceMaterials scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineeringPhysicsThermodynamicsGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Weirs and notches are efficient devices for measuring flow rates. Banks of slit weirs forming multislit weirs allow both precise discharge measurements in a very large range of flow rates and permit a good flow regulation. V-shaped weirs are traditionally used as precise laboratory flow measuring devices, especially in the low discharge ranges. In the current investigation, the method of images was used to form the V-shaped multislit weir system to allow measurement and regulation of flows in a large range of flows that includes very low flow rates. Experimental studies were conducted to determine the discharge coefficients of V-shaped multislit weirs over a wide range of weir Reynolds numbers. The study provided a single relation between the weir discharge coefficient and the weir Reynolds number for both the rectangular and V-shaped multislit weir systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Irrigation and Drainage EngineeringSame topicHydraulic flow and structuresFrench-language works237,207