MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994284341 · doi:10.1021/ie020305h

Advanced Fluidized Bed Combustion Sorbent Reactivation Technology

2003· article· en· W1994284341 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIron and Steelmaking Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSorbentGrindingSlurryCombustionWaste managementFluidized bedFluidized bed combustionBottom ashCoalChemical engineeringEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industryMaterials scienceChemistryMetallurgyEnvironmental engineeringAdsorptionEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new technique for simultaneous grinding and hydrating of fluidized bed combustion (FBC) bottom ash has been developed. This method has been shown to be effective in hydrating the CaO component of the ash, so that the sorbent is reactivated. Careful control of water levels is required to prevent energy demand increases for grinding. No problems associated with the potentially exothermic reaction of water with FBC bottom ash have been observed during grinding. When excess water (over that required by hydration) is used, the resulting material is a slurry and, while quantitative conversion of CaO in the solids is achieved, using the slurry for the sorbent would require a redesign of the limestone feed system. Therefore, coal or unreacted ash is added to the mixture after grinding. The resulting dry product contains the spent bed material in a completely hydrated form. The reactivated ash produced has been evaluated for sulfur capture using thermogravimetric analysis and a CFBC pilot plant. Conversion rates of almost 100% are achieved for ash after grinding hydration. An industrial demonstration of the technology has supported its viability with no decrease in sulfur capture, while limestone requirements decreased by 18%. The economic implications of the industrial applicability of the technology are outlined in a case study using the Point Aconi CFBC unit. Decreased limestone usage is calculated to net savings in the order of $500000/year. The project is calculated to have an equity payback of less than 1 year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it