MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994380397 · doi:10.2118/89430-ms

Capillary Number in Heavy Oil Solution Gas Drive and Its Relationship with Gas-Oil Relative Permeability Curves

2004· article· en· W1994380397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelative permeabilityCapillary actionPetroleum engineeringPermeability (electromagnetism)Volumetric flow rateCapillary numberBubbleEnvironmental scienceCapillary pressureMechanicsChemistryMaterials scienceGeologyPorous mediumComposite materialPhysicsPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Many heavy oil reservoirs under solution gas drive show a significant increase in productivity. Different mechanisms have been postulated to explain the high recovery factors observed in the field. Lately, a widely accepted cause of this increase in productivity is the foamy oil flow, which dramatically decreases the gas relative permeability. However, it still remains inadequately understood. It has been reported that the foamy flow effects observed in the laboratory depletion tests are strongly affected by depletion rate. This observed rate effect has been attributed to the influence of the pressure depletion rate on bubble nucleation. However, the researchers have mostly overlooked the capillary number, which increases significantly with increasing depletion rate. The goal of this study was to examine this capillary number effect in heavy oil reservoirs and its relationship with gas-oil relative permeability curves. A number of experiments were carried out on a two-meter long sand-pack to determine the conditions required to produced more oil under solution gas drive. The experimental data were matched on a commercial black oil simulator to determine the relative permeability curve under varying flow conditions and at different capillary number. The experimental results show that the oil produced was a unique function of capillary number and beyond a critical capillary number no additional improvement in the recovery factor was observed. An examination of the changes of capillary number during the test provides insight into the gas-phase build up during solution gas drive and the resulting production behavior. It was also found that oil relative permeability increases and gas relative permeability decreases with increasing capillary number. At high capillary number, relative permeability ratio remains very low up to higher value of gas saturation. The results from this research suggest that the conventional correlations of gas-oil relative permeability should incorporate the effect of capillary number in order to improve the prediction of foamy oil flow mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it