MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994431896 · doi:10.1112/plms/pdl002

The spine of a Fourier-Stieltjes algebra

2006· article· en· W1994431896 on OpenAlexaff
Monica Ilie, Nico Spronk

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the London Mathematical Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsHomomorphismLocally compact spaceLocally compact groupGroup algebraAbelian groupAmenable groupBounded functionGroup (periodic table)CombinatoricsQuotientLattice (music)Algebra over a fieldPure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We define the spine A *(G) of the Fourier–Stieltjes algebra B (G) of a locally compact group G. This algebra encodes information about much of the fine structure of B (G), particularly information about certain homomorphisms and idempotents. We show that A *(G) is graded over a certain semi-lattice, that of non-quotient locally precompact topologies on G. We compute the spine's spectrum G*, which admits a semi-group structure. We discuss homomorphisms from A *(G) to B (H) where H is another locally compact group; and we show that A *(H) contains the image of every completely bounded homomorphism from the Fourier algebra A (H) of any amenable group G. We also show that A *(G) contains all of the idempotents in B (G). Finally, we compute examples for vector groups, abelian lattices, minimally almost periodic groups and the (ax + b)-group; and we explore the complexity of A *(G) for the discrete rational numbers and free groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the London Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207