MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994462105 · doi:10.1177/1468018112443685

Travelling ideas and domestic policy change: The transnational politics of reproductive rights/health in Argentina

2012· article· en· W1994462105 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Social Policy · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Politics and Representation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReproductive rightsAbortionPoliticsPolitical scienceSocial policyReproductive healthPolitical economyEconomic growthPublic administrationDevelopment economicsSociologyEconomicsLawPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the transnational flow of social policy ideas, in particular their importance in advancing gender equality policies in countries with strong conservative gender norms that have a history of neglecting reproductive rights. Focusing on the case of Argentina, it illustrates how internationally sanctioned ideas contributed to these important policy changes helping in the adoption of a federal programme of contraception; yet abortion remains illegal. New policies have been adopted, but important elements of the old regime have been preserved. While the study demonstrates the importance of travelling policy ideas, it is also a reminder of the continued importance of national politics and policy legacies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it