MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994626389 · doi:10.1021/ie048877k

The Reinforcement of Calcium Carbonate Filled Papers with Phosphorus-Containing Polymers

2005· article· en· W1994626389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhosphonateCationic polymerizationChemistryAcrylatePolyelectrolytePolymer chemistryPhosphatePolymerAcrylic acidCalcium carbonateCopolymerCarboxylateAqueous solutionChemical engineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anionic polyelectrolytes bearing phosphate or phosphonate groups were compared to poly(acrylic acid- co -acrylamide) as reinforcing polymers for paper filled with calcium carbonate. Cationic polyvinylamine, PVAm, was used to promote adsorption of the anionic polymers onto fiber and filler surfaces in the aqueous papermaking suspension. Both poly(acrylamide- co -vinyl phosphonate), PAMVP, and phosphate esters of poly(vinyl alcohol), PVAP, gave stronger paper than did the acrylate copolymers. PAMVP bound soluble calcium ions, resulting in the formation of multichain colloidal-sized clusters. Subsequent addition of PVAm produced dispersed, cationic polyelectrolyte complexes. The polyacrylates bound less soluble calcium and formed weakly scattering clusters. It is proposed that the phosphate and phosphonate groups promote polymer adhesion to the calcium carbonate surfaces, resulting in stronger paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it