MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994668362 · doi:10.1353/mou.0.0080

Texts and Culture in Late Antiquity. Inheritance, Authority, and Change (review)

2008· article· en· W1994668362 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipArgument (complex analysis)Inheritance (genetic algorithm)ClassicsCeltic languagesNarrativeHistoryLate AntiquityLiteraturePeriod (music)GenealogyLawArtPolitical scienceAncient historyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Texts and Culture in Late Antiquity. Inheritance, Authority, and Change Michael Fournier J.H.D. Scourfield, ed. Texts and Culture in Late Antiquity. Inheritance, Authority, and Change. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 2007. Pp. xii +346. US $89.50. ISBN 978-1-905125-17-3. This volume is a valuable contribution to scholarship on intellectual culture in late Antiquity, and one that more than justifies itself as an addition to the ever increasing number of conference proceedings published each year. In fact only six of the thirteen chapters (all in English, mostly by scholars from Ireland and the United Kingdom, but also Europe and the United States) are reworkings of papers presented at the first Celtic Conference [End Page 488] in Classics as part of a panel entitled "Late Antiquity: its uses of inherited texts." The rest were written for this collection. David Scourfield was the chair of the panel in 2000, and his own contribution continues in that spirit. His chapter, "Textual inheritances and textual relations in late Antiquity," goes far beyond the obligatory editor's introduction with its perfunctory summaries of papers. Instead, Scourfield puts forward his own argument, that the idea of transformation, while not intended to efface the justifiable narratives of decline and transition which characterise scholarship on the period, should be set down as a corrective to the one-sidededness of those prevailing narratives. Scourfield weaves summaries of the volume's contributions together into the evidence for his own thesis. None of the contributions is easily summarized, and Scourfield takes more than a page for more than half of the chapters, and almost an entire page for the rest. The generous discussion of each chapter also serves to highlight the high degree of interconnectedness and integration of the collection (though there are surprisingly few cross references in the contributors' notes). For the purposes of the volume Scourfield defines the parameters of "late Antiquity" as "roughly the period from the middle of the third to the middle of the fifth century," and the "lands more or less under Roman control" (4). Still, this means treatments of texts and figures from Italy, Spain, Gaul, Greece and Macedonia, North Africa, Egypt, Palestine and Syria. The coherence of the volume comes from the fact that each chapter deals in some way with the reception and transformation of one (or more) of the "texts of special authority" (vii): Homer, Virgil, Plato, and the Bible. The chapters are not organised chronologically, since many treat more than one text or author, and many of their dates are uncertain. For the purposes of this review I will focus on the way that the inherited texts of Homer, Virgil, Plato and the Bible structure the volume. In "A new created world: classical geographical texts and Christian contexts in late Antiquity," Mark Humphries explores the "very real continuity" (55) between the classical geography of Pliny and the geography of Medieval Christendom exemplified in the 13th century Hereford mappa-mundi. This continuity is explored through a consideration of three texts: the Expositio Totius Mundi et Gentium, the Descriptio Totius Mundi, and Orosius' Seven books of Histories against the Pagans. These works document both the transformation and the preservation of the cultural ideology embedded in the classical geographical texts. The Bible is the text of special authority. The exegete's need for geographical knowledge, argued for by St. Augustine in his De Doctrina Christiana and exemplified in the late Antique practice of binding books of the Bible together with classical geographical texts, resulted in the rereading and rewriting of these texts. The Descriptio attests to a Christianisation of the Expositio (through both [End Page 489] excisions and interpolations), while Orosius preserves much that belongs to his pagan predecessors because for him, "the Roman empire had been specially favoured by the Christian God: therefore its geography was a reflection of God's design for the world" (56). The next four papers deal with Virgil, and from the discipline of geography, we move to the ars grammatica. Anna Chahoud's "Antiquity and authority in Nonius Marcellus" considers, among others, Virgil's role as an authority for the North African lexicographer. Chahoud presents a case for rereading...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it