MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995013804 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450800519

Assessing the Performance of Model Predictive Controllers

2002· article· en· W1995013804 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsShell (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlMetric (unit)Computer scienceStatisticControl theory (sociology)Function (biology)Measure (data warehouse)Value (mathematics)Relevance (law)Performance metricMathematical optimizationControl (management)MathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMachine learningData miningStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Performance assessment of model predictive controllers is a problem of significant industrial relevance. Model predictive controllers belong to a class of linear time‐varying controllers, which compute the future control actions by minimizing a constrained, time‐varying objective function. In this work we propose a performance statistic that takes into account the time‐varying and constrained nature of model predictive control. The proposed measure compares the achieved objective function with its design value, online. Analytical expressions are derived to calculate the expected value of the design objective function under closed loop conditions. Simulation and industrial case studies are used to illustrate the applicability of the proposed metric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it