MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995022711 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.075316

Experimental evidence for semiconducting behavior of Si-XII

2011· article· en· W1995022711 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Surface Polishing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSiliconDiamondMaterials scienceMetastabilitySemiconductorCondensed matter physicsSemimetalDiamond cubicPhase (matter)Band gapOptoelectronicsComposite materialChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conventional diamond cubic phase of silicon, so-called Si-I, exhibits the desirable semiconducting properties on which the silicon chip industry relies and it is by far the most stable of all silicon phases. However, other phases of silicon can be formed under pressure and some of them are metastable at room temperature and pressure. Two such phases, Si-III (BC8) and Si-XII (R8), can be produced by indentation with a diamond tip but, despite an understanding of their structure, little is known about their electrical properties. As we demonstrate experimentally, such phases can have entirely different (electrical) properties to normal (diamond cubic) silicon, consistent with recent theoretical studies that predict Si-XII to be a narrow-band-gap semiconductor and Si-III to be a semimetal. We report here electrical measurements on the Si-XII phase and demonstrate that it is indeed a semiconductor. Furthermore, and somewhat surprisingly, both boron and phosphorus can be electrically activated in the Si-XII structure during its formation by indentation at room temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it