MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995395562 · doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-08-04622-9

Fixed point property and the Fourier algebra of a locally compact group

2008· article· en· W1995395562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsLocally compact groupNoncommutative geometryLocally compact spaceGroup (periodic table)Compact groupFixed-point propertyFixed pointGroup algebraCommutative propertyIdeal (ethics)Pure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldDiscrete mathematicsFixed-point theoremMathematical analysisLie group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We establish some characterizations of the weak fixed point property (weak fpp) for noncommutative (and commutative) $\mathcal {L}^1$ spaces and use this for the Fourier algebra $A(G)$ of a locally compact group $G.$ In particular we show that if $G$ is an IN-group, then $A(G)$ has the weak fpp if and only if $G$ is compact. We also show that if $G$ is any locally compact group, then $A(G)$ has the fixed point property (fpp) if and only if $G$ is finite. Furthermore if a nonzero closed ideal of $A(G)$ has the fpp, then $G$ must be discrete.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it