MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995554557 · doi:10.1002/net.10016

Deterministic radio broadcasting at low cost

2002· article· en· W1995554557 on OpenAlexaff
Anders Dessmark, Andrzej Pelc

Bibliographic record

VenueNetworks · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadcasting (networking)Computer scienceNode (physics)Computer networkFocus (optics)Wireless ad hoc networkNetwork topologyRadio networksUpper and lower boundsDistributed computingTopology (electrical circuits)Wireless networkTelecommunicationsWirelessMathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We consider distributed deterministic broadcasting in synchronous radio networks. A node receives a message in a given round if and only if exactly one of its neighbors transmits. The source message has to reach all nodes. We assume that nodes do not know the network topology or even their immediate neighborhood. (Such networks are calledad hoc.) We are concerned with two efficiency measures of broadcasting algorithms: their executiontime(number of rounds) and theircost(number of transmissions). We focus our study on the execution time of algorithms which have cost close to minimum. We consider two scenarios depending on whether nodes know or do not know global parameters of the network: the numbernof nodes and the eccentricityDof the source. Our main contribution is proving tight lower bounds on the time of low‐cost broadcasting which show sharp differences between these scenarios. In each case, we also give broadcasting algorithms whose performance matches these lower bounds. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNetworksSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207