MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995633429 · doi:10.1081/sta-120017224

CONVERGENCE RATES OF ESTIMATORS IN PARTIAL LINEAR REGRESSION MODELS WITH MA(∞) ERROR PROCESS

2002· article· en· W1995633429 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoqian Sun, Jinhong You, Gemai Chen, Xian Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Regina
FundersHong Kong Polytechnic University
KeywordsMathematicsEstimatorApplied mathematicsAutocovarianceAutocorrelationRate of convergenceLeast absolute deviationsLinear regressionProper linear modelSmoothingStatisticsPolynomial regressionComputer scienceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with a partial linear regression model with serially correlated random errors which are unobservable and modeled by a moving-average process of infinite order. We study a class of estimators for the linear regression coefficients as well as the function characterizing the non-linear part of the model, constructed based on general kernel smoothing and least squares methods. The law of iterated logarithm and strong convergence rates of these estimator are derived by truncating the moving-average error process, a procedure widely applied in the analysis of time series. Our results can be used to establish uniform strong convergence rate of the estimators of autocovariance and autocorrelation functions of the error process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.038
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.146
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0380.146
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and MethodsSame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207