MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Pathogenesis of Contact Lens‐Related Keratitis

2006· article· en· W1995709047 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptometry and Vision Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Surface and Contact Lens
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
FundersNational Eye Institute
KeywordsContact lensLens (geology)OptometryKeratitisCorneaSightMedicineEye careMultidisciplinary approachIntensive care medicineOpticsOphthalmologyPolitical sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacterial infection of the cornea is a rare, but sight-threatening, complication of contact lens wear that was first reported shortly after soft lenses were introduced onto the market in the 1970s. During the past 3 decades, various attempts to solve the problem with new lens types and lens care products have failed to make a significant impact on its incidence. Eliminating contact lens-related infections will likely require a better understanding of the ocular defense system, microbial virulence strategies, how they affect one another, and the effects of contact lens wear on both. Each of these topics is complex. Although research in this area is therefore challenging and necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, what we are learning along the way has significance beyond contact lens-related infection and could ultimately lead to the development of new strategies to prevent this and a range of other sight- and life-threatening diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it