MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995804124 · doi:10.1186/1687-6180-2012-28

Biologically inspired signal processing: analyses, algorithms and applications

2012· article· en· W1995804124 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSignal processingAlgorithmSIGNAL (programming language)Multidimensional signal processingDigital signal processingComputer hardwareProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many of the problems that are encountered in Engineering have been solved in nature. In their quest for survival species have developed ingenious solutions to these problems over millions of years. As Darwin noted, these solutions that natural evolutionary processes have and are still in the process of perfecting, are in most cases far superior to what we can achieve with our current engineering knowledge and methods. This should come as no surprise when one considers the power of natural selection and the vast time span and enormous scale of possibilities that it operates over. As we improve our knowledge of our natural environment and continually discover the wonders it has evolved, it is important to draw inspiration from it. Understanding how nature implements what it has perfected over such a long time, what solutions it has selected and those it has discarded, will surely lead to significant advances in Signal Processing Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.874

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it