MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996282723 · doi:10.1002/env.955

Derivation of sample oriented quantile function using maximum entropy and self‐determined probability weighted moments

2009· article· en· W1996282723 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmetrics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersSpecialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of ChinaUniversity Network of Excellence in Nuclear Engineering
KeywordsQuantileOutlierPrinciple of maximum entropyMathematicsQuantile functionStatisticsSample size determinationEstimatorMoment (physics)Random variableSample (material)Probability density functionApplied mathematicsMoment-generating function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The paper proposes a new distribution free method for deriving the quantile function of a non‐negative random variable using the principle of maximum entropy (MaxEnt) subject to constraints in terms of the self‐determined probability‐weighted moments estimated from observed sample data. The principle of MaxEnt constrained by probability weighted moments (PWMs) was utilized to estimate the quantile function. For correct estimation of a quantile function, outliers must be rationally considered in the analysis. However, conventional PWM was criticized for assigning non‐exceedance probabilities to sample points based on only their rank number in an ordered series rather than the magnitude of the points themselves, hereby being unable to satisfactorily accommodate outlier in a finite sample. The difficulty in obtaining accurate PWM estimates from samples has been the main impediment to the application of the MaxEnt Principle in extreme quantile estimation. This paper is an attempt to circumvent this difficulty by the use of self‐determined probability‐weighted moments, which are completely decided by the distribution itself and sample data's magnitude. By interpreting the SD‐PWM as moment of quantile function, the paper derives a more rigorous quantile function using MaxEnt principle, which is extraordinarily suitable for cases with small samples containing outliers. An efficient algorithm is presented to estimate the unknown parameters of this sample oriented MaxEnt QF. Comparative studies and numerical analysis are performed to assess the accuracy of the proposed QF estimation method. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it