MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996386660 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2006.277572

A Visual SLAM Solution Based on High Level Geometry Knowledge and Kalman Filtering

2006· article· en· W1996386660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInitializationExtended Kalman filterRobustness (evolution)Simultaneous localization and mappingKalman filterComputer visionArtificial intelligenceGeometric primitiveComputer scienceFeature (linguistics)Epipolar geometryNoise (video)RobotImage (mathematics)Mobile robot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, two new methods are proposed for robotic simultaneous localization and map building (SLAM), namely high level geometric knowledge constraint and newly acquired feature initialization. These methods are implemented within classic extended Kalman filter (EKF) framework. Novelties lie in two aspects. First, high level geometric information, such as common geometric primitives (e.g. lines and triangles) constructed by observed feature points, is incorporated to EKF to enhance the robustness and resistance to noise. Second, a visual measurement approach, multiple view geometry (MVG), is employed for new feature initialization that is considered as a key factor affecting the lower bound error in robotic mapping. Simulations are performed, which can be deemed as concrete verifications and extensions to previous results reported by other researchers. The numerical results show great potentials

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207