MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996652185 · doi:10.1353/pgn.2002.0059

Chaucer's Pardoner's Prologue and Tale: An Annotated Bibliography, 1900-1995 (review)

2002· article· en· W1996652185 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueParergon · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrologueInterpretation (philosophy)CriticismClassicsLiteratureTheme (computing)ReignPublishingPhilosophyHistoryArt historyArtLawLinguisticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Short Notices 299 The introduction, though short, is of high interest for its succinct tracing of changes in the definition of the word 'fabliau'. Short and Pearcy find that fabliau humour has as its basis logic, and this is their criterion for inclusion or exclusion of candidates for their collection. The editors justify the existence of this small anthology byfirstreferring to 'linguistic heritage', then to the question of what constitutes a fabliau, from the eighteenth-century edition of Legrand d'Aussy to the latest 'Recueil complef ofW . N o o m e n and N. van den Boogaard, and, finally, to a desire to demonstrate what contribution the Anglo-Norman corpus made to the genre as a whole. Maxwell J. Walkley University of Sydney Sutton, Marilyn, ed., Chaucer's Pardoner's Prologue and Tale: An Annotated Bibliography, 1900-1995 (The Chaucer Bibliographies), Toronto, University ofToronto Press, 2000; cloth; pp. liii, 445; R R P US$95.00; ISBN 0802047440. In 1940, G. G. Sedgewick, reviewing commentary on 'The Pardoner's Tale', observed that 'research and criticism and interpretation have been busy with the noble ecclesiasf; 60 years later, the busy-ness goes on apace, with well over 1,000 items published up to 1995. M u c h of this discussion is sharp and full of interest, as Marilyn Sutton says, treating a figure w h o disturbs, fascinates, but also compels responses that reveal as much about his audience as him. So it always was, from the moment of the Host's retort; the Tale seems to have been admired by its first audience, while thefifteenth-centuryresponse, according to Strohm, was to write out the discordant and disreputable, or to ignore the tale altogether. Sutton's Bibliography performs its necessary, referential task, but also reveals the extraordinary range of issues that have interested critical readers: drunkenness, irony, satire, voice, homodiegetic and heterodiegetic narratives, eunuchry, homosexuality, the plague, post-plague playfulness, animal symbolism, number symbolism, rhetoric, sermon practice, liturgy, institutional context, the 'paradox of art', 'theological despair', transubstantiation, speech act theory, theatricality, masochism, banana-skins (yes), the 'hegemonic discourse ofidentity', and so on. The Bibliography also shows critical discussion turning to dissension, often in reviews Sutton usefully includes, allowing us to mark the shifting patterns of critical fashion. If Vance finds Benson's criticism outdated, that speaks of a 300 Short Notices late twentieth-century obsession with theory; in the most recent critical turn, the Pardoner's much discussed homosexuality is in question again, but, prompted by queer theory, the critic drives the question to radically new conclusions. After sections devoted to editions and bibliographical materials, criticism on the Pardoner is presented according to two chronologies: dates ofpublication, within sequences determined by the Pardoner's several appearances in the 'General Prologue' and the tales. This necessarily complicated arrangement makes for a certain clumsiness and repetition, but Sutton does a fair job of articulating her categories one to another. O n the other hand, her bibliographical practice sometimes buckles surprisingly under pressure to get the book into print. Numbering fails from time to time: so 516 is followed by 516a, and 516b, not 517; this might not matter, but the Index refers under 'Sexuality' to an absent 516c. Item 994 simply reads 'Item canceled'. The Index, crucial to the success of such a volume, is usefully detailed, but often feels cumbersome and again it is not always correct. The survey is comprehensive, but there are omissions: so, the Hieatts' 1964 edition of The Canterbury Tales is described, but not their 1961 illustrated, bowdlerised children's edition. A n d it is regrettable that 'Analogues' could not stretch to m o d e m instances like the film 'Shallow Grave'. Bibliographies, however accurate and informative, necessarily suffer from their own obsolesence, which suggests that the true future of these retrospective publications, as the General Editor recognises, lies not in print but electronic text, where the past becomes an ever reviewed, renewable, present. In the meantime, there is much help to be had from Sutton's Bibliography of scholarship and criticism on Chaucer's Pardoner, and not a little pleasure. Roger Nicholson Department ofEnglish University of Auckland Tread gold, Warren, A Concise History...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it