MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996815387 · doi:10.1119/1.2120387

Resistance Is Not Futile: Air Resistance in an Algebra-Based Course

2005· article· en· W1996815387 on OpenAlexaff
Ian Lovatt, Bill Innes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Physics Teacher · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of CanadaMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCourse (navigation)Object (grammar)Fraction (chemistry)KinematicsAccelerationTerminal velocityScope (computer science)ProjectileTerminal (telecommunication)Simple (philosophy)MathematicsAlgebra over a fieldCalculus (dental)Computer sciencePhysicsClassical mechanicsEngineeringMechanicsPure mathematicsProgramming languageAerospace engineeringQuantum mechanicsArtificial intelligenceEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we show that an object's terminal speed due to air resistance depends not on any of the object's details, but only on the distance at which an object reaches a particular fraction of its terminal speed. We show this graphically and algebraically. Although a mathematical treatment of air resistance is beyond the scope of an algebra-based, introductory physics course, some of the concepts involved are important for (at least) three reasons. First, the equations used for uniform acceleration only approximately (and perhaps badly!) describe projectiles students know (a home-run baseball, for example). With the equation for terminal speed, students can estimate the speeds at which the simple kinematic equations no longer produce “reasonable” approximations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Physics TeacherSame topicExperimental and Theoretical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207