Forecasting Exchange Rate in India: An Application of Artificial Neural Network Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper employs Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to forecast foreign exchange rate in India during 1992-2009. We used two types of data set (daily and monthly) for US dollar, British pound, euro and Japanese yen. The performance of forecasting is quantified by using various loss functions namely root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute deviation (MAD) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Empirical results confirm that ANN is an effective tool to forecast the exchange rate. The technique gives the evidence that there is possibility of extracting information hidden in the foreign exchange rate and predicting it into the future. The evaluation of the proposed model is based on the estimation of the average behaviour of the above loss functions.Keywords- Exchange Rate; Neural Network
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.088 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it