MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997431101 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2007.366500

Optimal Data Incest Removal in Bayesian Decentralized Estimation Over a Sensor Network

2007· article· en· W1997431101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer scienceDimension (graph theory)Network topologyGraphTopology (electrical circuits)Bayesian probabilityMathematical optimizationInteger (computer science)Bayesian networkDistributed computingData miningMathematicsTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fundamental issue in Bayesian decentralized estimation over a sensor network is the inadvertent multiple re-use of data also known as data incest. We show the relationship between data incest and the network topology by using a graph theoretical formulation. A novel necessary and sufficient condition based on the topology of the network is derived so that data incest management can be optimally achieved. This approach requires large storage capabilities at the sensor level. In the case of an arbitrary network, if the necessary and sufficient condition for data incest does not hold then finding a sub-optimal strategy requires solving a 0-1 integer optimization problem where the dimension of the vector to optimize increases with time. Numerical results illustrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it