MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997921743 · doi:10.1109/carpi.2012.6473341

Localization and archiving of inspection data collected on power lines using LineScout Technology

2012· article· en· W1997921743 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Inspection Robots
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
FundersHydro-Québec
KeywordsOdometerComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemLine (geometry)Process (computing)Field (mathematics)Plan (archaeology)Power (physics)CatenaryPosition (finance)Simple (philosophy)Real-time computingDatabaseArtificial intelligenceEngineeringTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past few years, a considerable amount of data has been collected during several field deployments of LineScout Technology for the inspection and maintenance of power line infrastructure. A number of lessons have been learned during this time, more specifically regarding the problem of localizing the findings and archiving them for quick future reference. First, the authors discuss the influence of wheel odometer precision and how enforcing constraints from the known position of towers and the expected theoretical catenary curve of the power line reduce the errors introduced by GPS. Second, a simple three-step file process is presented to properly plan, conduct and report inspection missions. Camera enhancement parameters and file format for storing the data collected are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Line Inspection RobotsFrench-language works237,207