MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997932713 · doi:10.1109/tnet.2012.2227338

Estimating Instantaneous Cache Hit Ratio Using Markov Chain Analysis

2012· article· en· W1997932713 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheFIFO (computing and electronics)Cache algorithmsCache invalidationSmart CacheCPU cacheCache coloringMarkov chainCache pollutionFIFO and LIFO accountingParallel computingAlgorithmOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a novel analytical model for estimating the cache hit ratio as a function of time. The cache may not reach the steady-state hit ratio when the number of Web objects, object popularity, and/or caching resources themselves are subject to change. Hence, the only way to quantify the hit ratio experienced by Web users is to calculate the instantaneous hit ratio. The proposed analysis considers a single Web cache with infinite or finite capacity. For a cache with finite capacity, two replacement policies are considered: Least Recently Used (LRU) and First-In-First-Out (FIFO). Based on the insights from the proposed analytical model, we propose a new replacement policy, called Frequency-Based-FIFO (FB-FIFO). The results show that FB-FIFO outperforms both LRU and FIFO, assuming that the number of Web objects is fixed. Assuming that new popular objects are generated periodically, the results show that FB-FIFO adapts faster than LRU and FIFO to the changes in the popularity of the cached objects when the cache capacity is large relative to the number of newly generated objects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it