MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998026731 · doi:10.2118/149331-ms

Examining the Effects of Stress Dependent Reservoir Permeability on Stimulated Horizontal Montney Gas Wells

2011· article· en· W1998026731 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Unconventional Resources Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryShell (Canada)
FundersShell Canada
KeywordsMicroseismPermeability (electromagnetism)Petroleum engineeringGeologySuperposition principleTight gasWell loggingUnconventional oilSoil sciencePetrologyHydraulic fracturingSeismologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Montney gas play in NE British Columbia and NW Alberta is undergoing intense development utilizing multi-stage fracturing of horizontal wells. Problems persist in determining an optimal development strategy for each area within the Montney. For the Groundbirch area, operators are in the early stages of development. As a consequence they have invested significantly in well monitoring including microseismic, pressure build-ups, real time rate and pressure measurements and offsetting pressure observation wells. Conventional core analysis indicates that reservoir rocks have permeability in the micro-Darcy range. Lab experiments indicate permeability is also a function of the changing effective stress. Effective stress increases and permeability decreases as production occurs. A coupled geomechanical/reservoir study was performed after 400 days of production history in order to match behavior and determine the sensitivity of conventional production forecasts to the changing stresses within the reservoir. This paper focuses on the performance analysis of a single Upper Montney well in the Groundbirch area. The approach is staged, with the analysis proceeding from the simple to the more complex. The first step involved an improved version of production analysis. After the identification of linear flow, the utility of a long neglected plot, dm/q versus superposition linear time is illustrated. The ability of this plot to accurately split production well performance into reservoir properties and skin effects introduced by the fracture treatments is shown. This has wide ranging implications for the industry. Finally a simple practical method has been found to compare performance of various types of horizontal multi-stage fracture treatments where the impact of reservoir properties has been removed. In the second step of the study various descriptions of the study well were developed for all the processes the well encountered. These reservoir simulation models successfully matched treatment placement, an early build-up test distorted by clean-up effects and long term production behavior. Models types ranged from constant reservoir permeability through stress dependent permeability variation. Techniques were developed that eliminated the need to perform the time consuming geomechanical calculations. This allows the use of conventional reservoir models with pressure dependent permeability functions of a special form, to be used in day to day analysis. Sensitivity of the predicted production response with these models was then quantified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it