Spectrometry methods for <i>in vivo</i> bone strontium measurements
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In vivo x‐ray fluorescence (XRF) and dual‐photon absorptiometry (DPA) are two widely accepted radiation‐based measurement techniques. The first one is mainly used for the measurement of toxic elements in the human body, while the second one is clinically used to measure bone density. In this paper we present a literature review of the application of these two techniques to in vivo strontium measurements. Strontium is a natural constituent of the human skeleton, where it may exert beneficial or detrimental effects depending on the dietary intake and other factors. Recently, several medical publications have focused on the beneficial effects on bone of pharmacological dosages of strontium, especially with regard to its anti‐osteoporotic effects. However, the mechanism by which strontium exerts its therapeutic action is still not known. XRF and DPA have the potential of providing unique information on bone strontium concentration, retention and elimination that cannot be gained at the moment in any other way. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it