MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998032481 · doi:10.1080/14888386.2008.9712906

Using species distribution models to effectively conserve biodiversity into the future

2008· article· en· W1998032481 on OpenAlexaffabout
Heather M. Kharouba, Julie L. Nadeau, Eric R. Young, Jeremy T. Kerr

Bibliographic record

VenueBiodiversity · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiodiversityClimate changeContext (archaeology)Environmental resource managementGeographyDistribution (mathematics)Endangered speciesLand useEcologyAdaptation (eye)Global changeLand use, land-use change and forestryEnvironmental planningHabitatEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian biodiversity is especially high in temperate southern regions, where human-dominated land uses are both intensive and widespread. As a result, endangered species are also disproportionately concentrated in these areas. Climate change presents a new threat across most of Canada, including areas of intensive human land use, which creates conditions for substantial shifts in species composition and potential losses of many rare species. Protected areas is one adaptation strategy but, in Canada, parks suffer from severe limitations in their distribution, size, and because they have static boundaries. Land use changes around several protected areas in Canada are leading increasingly to their effective isolation, a trend we demonstrate using high resolution satellite data. Little published research has yet addressed this issue in the Canadian context, although some models now forecast ecological changes in the next century. Adaptation to global change impacts will necessitate refocusing conservation strategies beyond the boundaries of protected areas to include broader landscape perspectives. Necessary responses to these challenges include validated models predicting future biotic responses to global change, expanded biodiversity monitoring across Canada, improvements to the patchwork of federal and provincial legislation protecting species, and preemptive conservation strategies that recognize impending transitions to unprecedented environmental conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiodiversitySame topicSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeFrench-language works237,207