MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998211931 · doi:10.1190/1.1598134

Coherent noise attenuation in the radial trace domain

2003· article· en· W1998211931 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)AttenuationPrestackSynthetic dataAlgorithmData setComputer scienceFrequency domainSet (abstract data type)TRACE (psycholinguistics)AcousticsDomain (mathematical analysis)SeismologyGeologyOpticsPhysicsImage (mathematics)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Coherent noise is a persistent problem in seismic imaging, and a number of techniques have been developed to attenuate it. The radial trace (RT) transform, a simple seismic data mapping algorithm, can be used as the basis for a particularly flexible and effective method for attenuating coherent noise on both prestack and poststack seismic data. Described here are the principles and some practical application details for attenuating coherent noise in the RT domain. A comparison between frequency–wavenumber (f–k) and RT domain filtering on a synthetic model is presented, and some of the differences and advantages of RT methods are identified. Next, RT coherent noise attenuation is demonstrated using a set of good-quality field data; it is then applied to a very noisy data set. The results obtained with this last set prove to be as good as, or better than, those produced using f–k filtering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it