MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998357780 · doi:10.1080/03610920902948236

Robust Estimation of State Occupancy Probabilities for Interval-Censored Multistate Data: An Application Involving Spondylitis in Psoriatic Arthritis

2009· article· en· W1998357780 on OpenAlexaffabout
David Tolusso, Richard J. Cook

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsoriatic arthritisCovariateNonparametric statisticsMedicineStatisticsSpondylitisEconometricsCategorical variableDemographyArthritisAnkylosing spondylitisMathematicsSurgeryInternal medicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We formulate a three-state illness-death model to estimate the proportion of psoriatic arthritis patients developing spondylitis over time. Data from a longitudinal cohort of patients are available but the transitions in this model are interval-censored for the onset of spondylitis; times of deaths are right-censored. Robust methods for estimating the prevalence of spondylitis over time are described based on differences in marginal survivor functions for state entry times in the spirit of Pepe et al. (Citation1991). Nonparametric estimates (Turnbull, Citation1976) and local likelihood estimates (Loader, Citation1999) of the marginal distributions are derived. Multiplicative intensity Markov regression models are used to examine covariate effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and MethodsSame topicStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceFrench-language works237,207