MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998357780 · doi:10.1080/03610920902948236

Robust Estimation of State Occupancy Probabilities for Interval-Censored Multistate Data: An Application Involving Spondylitis in Psoriatic Arthritis

2009· article· en· W1998357780 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsoriatic arthritisCovariateNonparametric statisticsMedicineStatisticsSpondylitisEconometricsCategorical variableDemographyArthritisAnkylosing spondylitisMathematicsSurgeryInternal medicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We formulate a three-state illness-death model to estimate the proportion of psoriatic arthritis patients developing spondylitis over time. Data from a longitudinal cohort of patients are available but the transitions in this model are interval-censored for the onset of spondylitis; times of deaths are right-censored. Robust methods for estimating the prevalence of spondylitis over time are described based on differences in marginal survivor functions for state entry times in the spirit of Pepe et al. (Citation1991). Nonparametric estimates (Turnbull, Citation1976) and local likelihood estimates (Loader, Citation1999) of the marginal distributions are derived. Multiplicative intensity Markov regression models are used to examine covariate effects. Keywords: Multistate analysisPsoriatic arthritisRobust estimationSpondylitisState occupancy probabilityMathematics Subject Classification: Primary 62N01, 62M05Secondary 62P10 Acknowledgments This research was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The authors thank Dr. Dafna Gladman for permission to use the data from the University of Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Clinic, and Drs. Dafna Gladman and Vinod Chandran for helpful discussions. R. J. Cook is Canada Research Chair in Statistical Methods for Health Research. Notes † p-value for test of common covariate effect on0 → 2 and1 → 2 transitions. † p-value for test of common covariate effect on0 → 2 and1 → 2 transitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it