The Link Between Identity Style and Intimacy: Does Emotional Intelligence Provide the Key?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors examined the relationships among identity, emotional intelligence, and intimacy. Participants were 325 emerging adults (69% women) who completed measures of identity processing styles (informational, normative, and diffuse-avoidant), identity commitment, and intimacy. A subsample (n = 174) completed the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test. The informational and normative identity styles were positively related to intimacy, whereas the diffuse-avoidant identity style was inversely related to intimacy. The informational style was positively related to emotional intelligence, and the diffuse-avoidant style was inversely related to emotional intelligence. Emotional intelligence was also positively related to intimacy. Mediation analyses revealed that emotional intelligence mediates the relationships between identity processing and intimacy for the informational (partial mediation) and diffuse-avoidant (full mediation) styles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it