MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998442488 · doi:10.1081/agb-120037212

Gelfand–Kirillov Dimension and Local Finiteness of Jordan Superpairs Covered by Grids and Their Associated Lie Superalgebras

2004· article· en· W1998442488 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Algebra · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLie superalgebraDimension (graph theory)Pure mathematicsLie algebraSuperalgebraAlgebra over a fieldAffine Lie algebraCurrent algebra

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper we show that a Lie superalgebra L graded by a 3-graded irreducible root system has Gelfand–Kirillov dimension equal to the Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of its coordinate superalgebra A, and that L is locally finite if and only A is so. Since these Lie superalgebras are coverings of Tits–Kantor–Koecher superalgebras of Jordan superpairs covered by a connected grid, we obtain our theorem by combining two other results. Firstly, we study the transfer of the Gelfand–Kirillov dimension and of local finiteness between these Lie superalgebras and their associated Jordan superpairs, and secondly, we prove the analogous result for Jordan superpairs: the Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of a Jordan superpair V covered by a connected grid coincides with the Gelfand– Kirillov dimension of its coordinate superalgebra A, and V is locally finite if and only if A is so.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it