MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998871078 · doi:10.1109/icc.2013.6655125

Distributed discovery services via EPC-BGP for mobile RFID

2013· article· en· W1998871078 on OpenAlexaff
Mazen G. Khair, Burak Kantarcı, Hussein T. Mouftah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRFID technology advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlocking (statistics)Computer scienceComputer networkOverhead (engineering)Border Gateway ProtocolDefault gatewayBacktrackingObject (grammar)ServerArchitectureDistributed computingRouting (electronic design automation)Routing protocolOperating systemStatic routing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose an extended architecture of the EPCglobal network that allows tracking objects. This architecture makes use of the distributed discovery services along with the EPC-BGP to provide detailed information about an object regardless of its location. In the EPCglobal network, each object is assigned an IPv6 address once it leaves the last gateway in the supply chain. The IP address of the last gateway enables backtracking of all the information about this object throughout the supply chain. To this end, EPC status updates are crucial in order to advertise any changes in the EPC into the supply chain. On the other hand, concurrent EPC updates, expired EPC databases and/or limitation of resources may cause blocking of an EPC update request. Therefore, we evaluate our proposed architecture in terms of blocking probability of the EPC update requests. To this end, We define three types of blocking, namely the Justified Update Blocking (JUB), Unjustified Update Acceptance (UUA), and Unjustified Update Blocking (UUB). We investigate the impact of the frequency of update advertisements on the blocking probability. Numerical results confirm the trade-off between blocking probability and communication/computation overhead due to EPC update messages. However, further investigation in terms of the number of advertisements and the distance between the routing tables confirms that advertisement of EPC update messages based on certain thresholds can overcome this trade-off.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRFID technology advancementsFrench-language works237,207