MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of genetically modified, herbicide‐tolerant crops and their management on soil food web properties and crop litter decomposition

2009· article· en· W1998889488 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Ecology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetically Modified Organisms Research
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAgronomyGlyphosateMicrocosmCropBiologyCover cropSoil biologyLitterGenetically modified cropsEnvironmental scienceSoil waterEcologyTransgene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1 Genetically modified (GM), herbicide-tolerant crops have been adopted extensively worldwide, resulting in increased homogenization of agricultural practices. However, several countries still view GM crops with trepidation, citing potential risks to human health and the environment. We currently know little about how non-target biota responds to cultivation of GM crops under field conditions. 2 This study describes a series of microcosm and field experiments in Ontario, Canada, that estimated the effects of transgenic, glyphosate-tolerant (GT) crops and their management on the abundances of detritivorous soil biota and crop litter decomposition. 3 Absolute abundance of few of the measured biotic groups were affected by either the herbicide or variety treatments and, where significant effects were observed, the responses were not consistent across all years or for all sample dates within a year. More frequently, but not consistently, the GT herbicide system was associated with increased fungal : bacterial biomass ratios, suggesting a state of reduced enrichment. 4 Although the conventional and GT varieties studied differed in composition, we observed few effects of the modification for glyphosate-tolerance on maize Zea mays and soybean Glycine max litter decomposition. Overall, the herbicide system associated with GT crops reduced soybean- and corn-litter decomposition, but responses were inconsistent across Ontario, with many trials demonstrating no effect. Effects were probably underrepresented in this study as average daily precipitation was positively correlated with the magnitude of this system effect and many sites received well-below average levels of precipitation. 5 Synthesis and applications. Most concerns regarding the potential impacts of GM crops on non-target biota have targeted traits associated with the biotechnology itself. However, shifts in management practices associated with biotechnology are also widespread and have the same, if not greater, potential to alter the structure and functioning of agroecosystem biodiversity. The lack of observed permanent negative effects on soil biota in this study is heartening; however, more research is required to determine the functional consequences of observed transient effects and effects on other biota, as well as how altered crop litter decomposition affects agroecosystem nutrient cycling and carbon sequestration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it