MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998973216 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2010.5548564

TSPC-DICE: A single phase clock high performance SEU hardened flip-flop

2010· article· en· W1998973216 on OpenAlexafffund
Shah M. Jahinuzzaman, Riadul Islam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsFlip-flopSoft errorSingle event upsetCMOSComputer scienceElectronic engineeringTransistorElectrical engineeringComputer hardwareEngineeringVoltageStatic random-access memory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a true single-phase clock (TSPC) flip-flop that is robust against radiation-induced single event upsets (SEUs) or soft errors. The flip-flop consists of an input stage that uses a single phase clock to pass the data to a storage unit at the positive edge of the clock. The single phase clock enables designing power-efficient and easily-routed clock-tree and reducing the NBTI effect on the setup and hold times. The storage unit consists of the SEU robust dual interlocked cell (DICE), which has four nodes that replicate the data bit and its complement for recovering from a single event transient (SET). Two nodes with the same logic value inside the storage unit drive a C-element at the output. The C-element masks the propagation of any SET from the internal nodes of the storage unit to the output. The proposed flip-flop consists of only 22 transistors, consumes smaller area, and exhibits as much as 12% lower power-delay product when compared with a recently reported SEU robust flip-flop implemented in a commercial 65nm CMOS technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiation Effects in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207