MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999048077 · doi:10.1063/1.2162149

Fine grading of sl(p2,C) generated by tensor product of generalized Pauli matrices and its symmetries

2006· article· en· W1999048077 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomogeneous spaceTensor productMathematical physicsPauli exclusion principlePure mathematicsMathematicsTensor (intrinsic definition)PhysicsPauli matricesProduct (mathematics)Algebra over a fieldTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Study of the normalizer of the MAD-group corresponding to a fine grading offers the most important tool for describing symmetries in the system of nonlinear equations connected with contraction of a Lie algebra. One fine grading that is always present in any Lie algebra sl(n,C) is the Pauli grading. The MAD-group corresponding to it is generated by generalized Pauli matrices. For such MAD-group, we already know its normalizer; its quotient group is isomorphic to the Lie group SL(2,Zn)×Z2. In this paper, we deal with a more complicated situation, namely that the fine grading of sl(p2,C) is given by a tensor product of the Pauli matrices of the same order p, p being a prime. We describe the normalizer of the corresponding MAD-group and we show that its quotient group is isomorphic to Sp(4,Fp)×Z2, where Fp is the finite field with p elements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it