Dependence of the Error in the Optimal Solution of Perturbation‐Based Extremum Seeking Methods on the Excitation Frequency
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In perturbation‐based extremum‐seeking methods, an excitation signal is added to the input, and the gradient, computed from the correlation between the input and output variations, is forced to zero. The main drawback of the method is that the speed of convergence, which is linked to the dither frequency, is slow due to the low value of dither frequency typically chosen. Increasing the excitation frequency may cause instability, but that could be corrected by phase compensation. In this paper, it is shown that an additional problem exists, i.e., the distance between the optimum and solution reached by the perturbation method is proportional to the square of the frequency of excitation and does not go to zero even when the amplitude of the excitation goes to zero. However, for Wiener/Hammerstein approximations, the error will indeed go to zero with the excitation amplitude. Simulation results on a distributed reaction system are used to illustrate the concepts presented in this work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it