MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999077758 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2011.2172823

Scalable Modulation for Video Transmission in Wireless Networks

2011· article· en· W1999077758 on OpenAlexaff
Lin Cai, Siyuan Xiang, Yuanqian Luo, Jianping Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceModulation (music)WirelessTransmission (telecommunications)ScalabilityComputer networkElectronic engineeringWireless networkWireless transmissionTelecommunicationsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract—In conventional wireless systems with layered architectures, the physical (PHY) layer equally treats all data streams from the upper layers and applies the same modulation and coding schemes to them. Newer systems such as Digital Video Broadcast start to introduce hierarchical modulation schemes with SuperPosition Coding (SPC) and support data streams of different priorities. However, SPC requires specialized hardware and has high complexity, which is not desirable for handheld devices. In this paper, we propose scalable modulation (s-mod) by reusing the current mainstream modulation schemes with software-based bit remapping. The performance evaluation has shown that s-mod can achieve the same and, in some cases, even better performance than SPC with much lower complexity. We further propose how to optimize the configuration of the PHY-layer s-mod and coding schemes to maximize the utility of video streaming with scalable video coding (SVC). Simulation results demonstrate substantial performance gains using s-mod and cross-layer optimization, indicating that s-mod and SVC are a good combination for video transmission in wireless networks. Index Terms—Scalable modulation (s-mod) and coding, scalable video coding (SVC), SuperPosition Coding (SPC). I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207