MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999144936 · doi:10.1163/016942410x488887

Modeling of Biologically Inspired Adhesive Pads Using Monte Carlo Analysis

2010· article· en· W1999144936 on OpenAlexaff
Masoud Safdari, Majid Baniassadi, Sasan Asiaei, Hamid Garmestani, S. Ahzi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdhesiveMaterials scienceMonte Carlo methodAdhesionSynthetic fiberFiberComposite materialBiological systemNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, the analysis and prototyping of biologically inspired adhesive pads have been the subject of growing interest. Similar to biological counterparts, these synthetic adhesives consist of rafts of tiny protruding fibers. The adhesion performance of these micro-engineered products is highly dependent on the geometrical and mechanical properties of the micro-fibers and the surface they adhere to. Small fluctuations in these parameters can drastically change their adhesion performance. In this investigation, a comprehensive mathematical model of a single micro-fiber with adhesion capability in contact with an uneven surface has been developed and the behavior of the model studied. To provide more realistic results, this analytical model could be extended to an array of micro-fibers. Thus, in a further step, using a Monte Carlo simulation, we studied an array of these micro-fibers under more realistic conditions with several degrees of uncertainty. The results deduced by this novel modeling approach are in good agreement with the experimental measurements of adhesion performance in synthetic adhesive pads available in literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Adhesion Science and TechnologySame topicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface InteractionsFrench-language works237,207