Regenerative Shock Absorber Using a Two-Leg Motion Conversion Mechanism
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the development of a novel regenerative shock absorber sized for a passenger car suspension system. The shock absorber includes a simple and highly efficient motion converter called a two-leg mechanism , a planetary gearhead, and a brushless three-phase rotary machine. The design and analysis of the regenerative shock absorber are presented by considering the dynamics and efficiency of the electromechanical device. The performance of the regenerative damper is evaluated under sinusoidal excitation inputs for typical amplitudes and frequencies in a vehicular suspension system. Experimental results show that a damping coefficient of $1720$ N$\cdot$s/m can be achieved by controlling the external loads. Furthermore, a mechanical energy conversion efficiency between 0.71 and 0.84 is achieved, which is considerably higher than other mechanisms reported in the literature, such as ball screw, rack-and-pinion, and linear mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it