MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999308265 · doi:10.1093/em/caq026

The unnatural trumpet

2010· article· en· W1999308265 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly Music · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Musicological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaroqueArtThe artsArchitectureQuarter (Canadian coin)IndustrialisationBroadsideHistoryMiddle AgesArt historyAestheticsVisual artsLiteratureAncient historyArchaeologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IN the modern establishment of Baroque orchestras using historical instruments, the trumpet has posed particularly intractable problems. Throughout the 18th and 19th centuries all instruments underwent alterations, but none was altered to the extent that the trumpet was. The last two centuries of development have completely changed their shape and the way in which they are played. The invention of valves created fully chromatic instruments that could be as little as a quarter of the length of their Baroque equivalents. Mouthpieces became significantly smaller. Not only did the trumpet's shape and function change radically but the techniques specific to Baroque trumpet playing became outmoded and forgotten. Given these changes, any revival of the Baroque instrument was going to be extremely difficult. My purpose here is to document the major features of this revival. A renewed interest in the history of all the arts, including music, may be observed in the newly industrialized nations of northern Europe from the middle of the 19th century onwards. In Britain, for example, the Arts and Crafts Movement of the 1880s emerged as a reaction to the social upheaval and environmental degradation caused by industrialization and the disproportionate opulence it created for a minority. Men such as John Ruskin (1819–1900) and William Morris (1834–96) championed the return to Gothic architecture, to medieval design and simplicity, to craftsmanship and community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it