Energizing the island community: a review of policy standpoints for energy in small island states and territories
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Small island states and island territories of larger countries tend to have ample renewable energy potential from sun, wind, waves, biomass and other sources. Nevertheless, they rely heavily on fossil fuels to generate electricity. Fluctuations in fossil fuel prices may impact significantly upon small island economies. This paper aims to help researchers and decision‐makers better understand the unique features of small islands in relation to the power industry. The paper identifies public policy influencing production of electricity and limitations to energy policy reform in small islands. A range of conventional and renewable energy options available to small island policy‐makers is presented using anecdotal evidence. It is argued that small islands need to build upon their energy resource potentials and by this exert more control over their energy futures. The paper concludes by recommending holistic strategies that small islands can use to enhance their long‐term energy security and sustainability. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it