MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999845558 · doi:10.1109/aim.2013.6584081

Model-based fault detection of Modular and Reconfigurable Robots with joint torque sensing

2013· article· en· W1999845558 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault detection and isolationTorqueJoint (building)Modular designRobotActuatorControl theory (sociology)Fault (geology)Computer scienceAccelerationEngineeringControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a Model-based approach to fault detection is proposed that is not reliant on measurement or estimation of joint acceleration. The proposed fault detection algorithm is intended for Modular and Reconfigurable Robots (MRR) with joint torque sensing. It functions by comparing the filtered joint torque command with a filtered torque estimate derived from the corresponding nonlinear dynamic model of MRR incorporating joint torque sensing. The proposed fault detection scheme is ideal for detecting faults in modular robots because of its independence on motion states of other modules for fault detection. Experiments were performed using three common faults associated with joint actuator and the results confirmed the theoretical proposal by successfully detecting faults independently for each joint module.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207