MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adenosine and caffeine modulate circadian rhythms in the Syrian hamster

2001· article· en· W1999918163 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircadian rhythmSleep deprivationAdenosineCaffeineEndocrinologySleep (system call)Internal medicinePeriod (music)Dark therapyFree-running sleepCircadian clockHamsterNeuroscience of sleepAntagonistAdenosine receptor antagonistPrivationAgonistLight effects on circadian rhythmPsychologyAdenosine receptorNeuroscienceWakefulnessMedicineReceptorElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extracellular adenosine accumulates in some brain areas during sleep deprivation. In Syrian hamsters, both sleep deprivation and adenosine A1 agonists can inhibit phase shifts of circadian rhythms to light at night. Sleep deprivation in the day (sleep period) can shift circadian phase. We examined whether the A1 agonist N-CHA mimics this effect. N-CHA (i.p. or i.c.) in the mid-sleep period induced dose-dependent shifts similar to those induced by 3 h sleep deprivation. The adenosine antagonist caffeine administered systemically at the mid-sleep period induced arousal without shifts, and dose-dependently attenuated shifts to a 3 h sleep deprivation procedure (running in a novel wheel). Adenosine may participate in resetting of the circadian clock by manipulations of behavioral state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it