MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000097048 · doi:10.1002/elan.201200215

A Simple Route of Modifying Copper Electrodes for the Determination of Methanol and Ethylene Glycol

2012· article· en· W2000097048 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectroanalysis · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEthylene glycolElectrodeAmperometryCopperMethanolAnodeX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMaterials scienceScanning electron microscopeFOIL methodInorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryElectrochemistryChemical engineeringChromatographyOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Copper foil electrodes were modified in a stirred NaOH solution at room temperature. Measurements with scanning electron microscopy, energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirmed the simultaneous structural transformation and chemical modification of the foil surface. The as‐prepared electrodes produced isolated anodic peaks in the cyclic voltammogram of methanol or ethylene glycol in alkaline solution. The highest anodic peak current was achieved at the electrode that was modified for 5 hours. Amperometric study illustrates that the modified electrode can detect lower than 100 µM methanol with a sensitivity of 15.8 µA/mM or 10 µM ethylene glycol with a sensitivity of 193 µA/mM. Importantly, the method is robust and the prepared electrodes show great reproducibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it