MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000097048 · doi:10.1002/elan.201200215

A Simple Route of Modifying Copper Electrodes for the Determination of Methanol and Ethylene Glycol

2012· article· en· W2000097048 on OpenAlexafffund
Xuefeng Hu, Jichang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueElectroanalysis · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEthylene glycolElectrodeAmperometryCopperMethanolAnodeX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMaterials scienceScanning electron microscopeFOIL methodInorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryElectrochemistryChemical engineeringChromatographyOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Copper foil electrodes were modified in a stirred NaOH solution at room temperature. Measurements with scanning electron microscopy, energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirmed the simultaneous structural transformation and chemical modification of the foil surface. The as‐prepared electrodes produced isolated anodic peaks in the cyclic voltammogram of methanol or ethylene glycol in alkaline solution. The highest anodic peak current was achieved at the electrode that was modified for 5 hours. Amperometric study illustrates that the modified electrode can detect lower than 100 µM methanol with a sensitivity of 15.8 µA/mM or 10 µM ethylene glycol with a sensitivity of 193 µA/mM. Importantly, the method is robust and the prepared electrodes show great reproducibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectroanalysisSame topicElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsFrench-language works237,207