Scalable distance-based outlier detection over high-volume data streams
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The discovery of distance-based outliers from huge volumes of streaming data is critical for modern applications ranging from credit card fraud detection to moving object monitoring. In this work, we propose the first general framework to handle the three major classes of distance-based outliers in streaming environments, including the traditional distance-threshold based and the nearest-neighbor-based definitions. Our LEAP framework encompasses two general optimization principles applicable across all three outlier types. First, our “minimal probing” principle uses a lightweight probing operation to gather minimal yet sufficient evidence for outlier detection. This principle overturns the state-of-the-art methodology that requires routinely conducting expensive complete neighborhood searches to identify outliers. Second, our “lifespan-aware prioritization” principle leverages the temporal relationships among stream data points to prioritize the processing order among them during the probing process. Guided by these two principles, we design an outlier detection strategy which is proven to be optimal in CPU costs needed to determine the outlier status of any data point during its entire life. Our comprehensive experimental studies, using both synthetic as well as real streaming data, demonstrate that our methods are 3 orders of magnitude faster than state-of-the-art methods for a rich diversity of scenarios tested yet scale to high dimensional streaming data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".