MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2000760706 · doi:10.3166/ria.18.261-298

Programmation bayésienne des robots

2004· article· fr· W2000760706 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Olivier Lebeltel, Pierre Bessìère, Julien Diard, Emmanuel Mazer

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose une mthode originale de programmation des robots fonde sur linfrence et lapprentissage baysien. Cette mthode traite formellement des problmes dincertitude et dincompltude inhrents au domaine considr. La principale difficult de la programmation des robots vient de linvitable incompltude des modles utiliss. Nous exposons le formalisme de description dune tche robotique ainsi que les mthodes de rsolution. Nous lillustrons en utilisant ce systme pour programmer une application de surveillance pour un robot mobile : le Khepera. Pour cela, nous utilisons des ressources gnriques de programmation appeles descriptions . Nous montrons comment dfinir et utiliser de manire incrmentale ces ressources (comportements ractifs, fusion capteur, reconnaissance de situations et squences de comportements) dans un cadre systmatique et unifi

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielle→Same topicLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge→French-language works237,207→