MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001005965 · doi:10.1002/env.707

A mixture model approach to analyzing major element chemistry data of the Changjiang (Yangtze River)

2005· article· en· W2001005965 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmetrics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCancerCare Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscretizationYangtze riverSampling (signal processing)Environmental scienceMonte Carlo methodDrainage basinHydrology (agriculture)Bayesian probabilityPosterior probabilityStatisticsMathematicsSoil scienceChinaGeologyGeographyComputer scienceCartographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article we study the statistical distributions of major chemical compositions (HCO3, Ca; charges are neglected for simplicity) and the total dissolved solid (TDS) concentration in the river water of the Changjiang (Yangtze River) of China. We propose a Bayesian finite mixture model with an unknown number of components for the multi-year averages of continuously monitored data over the period 1958–1990 at 191 stations in the drainage basin. A discretization-based Monte Carlo sampling approach is used to estimate the posterior distributions of the parameters in the model. Two sub-populations are identified for the levels of TDS, HCO3 and Ca, and observations from the 191 stations are classified into two groups using the posterior classification probabilities. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it