A FAST AND EFFECTIVE TIMING-DRIVEN PLACEMENT TOOL FOR FPGAs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present TQPF, a Timing-Driven Quadratic-based Placement Tool for FPGAs. Quadratic placement algorithms try to minimize total squared wire length by solving linear equations. The resulting placement tends to locate all cells near the center of the chip with a large amount of overlap. Also, since squared wire length is only an indirect measure of linear wire length, the resulting total wire length may not be minimized. We propose methods to alleviate the above two problems that give high-quality results while minimizing the total run time. We incorporate multiple iterations of equation-solving process together with a technique for pulling nodes out of the dense area while minimizing linear wire length. Experimental results using 20 Microelectronics Center of North Carolina (MCNC) benchmark circuits show that, on average, TQPF is approximately three times faster than the well-known Versatile Placement and Routing tool for FPGAs (VPR). The estimated total wire length, on average, is only 1.4% longer, and the critical path delay is 4.9% lower.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it