An efficient hierarchical parallel genetic algorithm for graph coloring problem
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graph coloring problems (GCPs) are constraint optimization problems with various applications including scheduling, time tabling, and frequency allocation. The GCP consists in finding the minimum number of colors for coloring the graph vertices such that adjacent vertices have distinct colors. We propose a parallel approach based on Hierarchical Parallel Genetic Algorithms (HPGAs) to solve the GCP. We also propose a new extension to PGA, that is Genetic Modification (GM) operator designed for solving constraint optimization problems by taking advantage of the properties between variables and their relations. Our proposed GM for solving the GCP is based on a novel Variable Ordering Algorithm (VOA). In order to evaluate the performance of our new approach, we have conducted several experiments on GCP instances taken from the well known DIMACS website. The results show that the proposed approach has a high performance in time and quality of the solution returned in solving graph coloring instances taken from DIMACS website. The quality of the solution is measured here by comparing the returned solution with the optimal one.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it